Thursday, September 4, 2014

Ross Ulbricht v. San Fransico State Supreme Court

Ross Ulbricht v. San Fransico State Supreme Court

October 1, 2013

Ross Ulbricht was detained at the San Francisco Library at 3:15pm, where through his laptop; the defendant performed illegal drug trades, through a site which allows currency exchanges in the form of Bitcoins; a newly digital currency that fluctuates at 653.4 a share. F.B.I, apprehended the suspect, minutes before allowing the suspect to close the laptop, which contains, Ross Ulbricht’s user’s profile information, detaining the defendant as the suspect, in charge of the sales.

The issue enclosed to the courts is that of discrepancy in apprehending the defendant by scrupulous procedure, violating the defendants Sixth Amendment; the right to search and seizures by warrant.
F.B.I. began taking inventory of Silk Road in September by approval of the Justice Department, identifying 13,000 listings for controlled substances, of opioids, psychedelics and ecstasy.

A site called Silk Road, considered the world largest black market for notorious for drugs, where transactions were taking place, was under F.B.I. investigation which under the user name Dead Pirate Roberts, led F.B.I. to identify Ulbricht as the owner of Silk Road; which revenue $1.2 Billion dollars’ worth of transactions, within two and a half years.

Silk Road is said to operate as a social media for online ecommerce trades, such as; ebay.com.
US SENATOR claim that the site was ran on Tor; an encrypted Internet network, which connects buyer, Silk Road ran on a cloud.

ISSUE


Was the detaining of Ulbricht against the defendant right to a 6th Amendment?

Holding
The defendant is identified as administering transactions out of a laptop, in which upon detainment, wasn’t able to close, which; if it would have closed, a password would have been necessary to log into the users profile, in order to identify the defendant as the leader of Drug Trafficking and administer of the Silk Road site under user name Dead Pirate Roberts.

The defendant at time of detainment, was administering under a page called ‘mastermind”, where 600,000 bitcoins, which value $80,000,000 dollars. Also, the defendant was under investigation, which is to be evaluated as legal procedure, where the defendant was sending out hits, which beating were staged by F.B.I. from Baltimore and Utah.

Rationale
By the safeguard of the Sixth Amendment, the right to a proper search and seizure; afforded to the defendant, allows a proper right to due process, where in question is Ulbricht identity in the case, and means of relation to the charged presented in the Ulbricht case.

The site Silk Road, allowed individual not only to trade, which in this matter narcotics, the site obtained postings from individuals, entailing; that of OxyContin, 5G Pure Cocaine Cristal, in which a staff paid in Bitcoins where used to deliver products of Dead Pirate Roberts, in packages concealed to avoid, dog sniffers, and other method to track the substance.
Senators Charles E. Schumer of New York and Joe Manchin III of West Virginia were demanding that the Justice department close Silk Road. In a September approval by Justice department, the F.B.I. identified 13,000 listing of drug like opioids, psychedelics and ecstasy, where a lack of Cyber law sanctions, allows a competent CPU, user to hack into the system and develop a silk road.

Under speculation by a Task Force based Baltimore, an agent Mr. Green; with agents from the Drug Enforcement Administration and Homeland Security Investigations, purchased a kilogram of cocaine in early 2012. Because under the federal constitution, the Supreme Court has the power to take on cases at any jurisdiction, the Federal level cases dealing with international relation, are jurisdiction for the federal government, which nine counts of Identity fraud and conspiracy to murder, under the direction of Ulbricht, was; ordered in under review, which the Southern District Court of New York, received as a complaint in November, as Mr. Ross Ulbricht is now detained in Manhattan, at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn.

July 3013, Border Protection intercepted a package from Canada, with his address, finding fake Id’s, with Photos of Ross Ulbricht with different names, from different countries and states, which allowed the Federal Government to intervene at the Federal Level, entering a jurisdiction out of state and district county control to a matter address by the Supreme Court. Another Clause that seemed to be of a matter, is under Article 4 Section one, commerce clause, trading funds with other nations, is prohibited under the jurisdiction of the United States constitution, where the defendant Ulbricht, refusing to answer Homeland Security’s questioning, purchased a $75,000 ‘economic citizenship in the Caribbean Island Dominica.

Upon the transaction on “economic citizenship”, gave the F.B.I. access to Silk Roads main servers, where legally, under treaty with other nations, the sites server gave access as a mirror account, July 23, 2013, which is the reason why the issue is if the Procedure break the law by violating constructional rights, and if the National Security Agency was involved?

December 12 2013, Mr. Ulbricht and Lawyer Dratel, pleaded not guilty to the alia of Ulbricht as Dead Pirate Roberts. Concurred, is that Ulbricht’s form of economics, is held as tyranny against the morals of the United States.

The government was able to track Silk Road by Ulbricht’s application to “economic citizen”, as the government are able to track transaction of Bitcoins, when converted into another currency, that of the international government. 

Sunday, March 23, 2014

POX AMERICA

Kipling "The White Man's Burden", Your will caught sallen best
 
Spanish American War
 
War With the Moros Phillipinos
 
Anti-Impacicles League
 
Nobel Prize In Literatuire
The national Security Strategy of the united States
 
La Recoquista-the reconguest
 
trialatuira Commisson and G7
 
Intra-Capitalist Competition-Geopolitics & Ideology
 
Lebensiraum/ defense Planning guidance 1994-1999
 
national Security Strategy of the UNited States Sept 2002
 
Defense Planning Guidence 1992
 
Kautskyite - ultra-impenatirm (CICTT)
 
French Gaullim(Branalt Commuussuib-Anglo Amerrica
 
Gold Window 
 
Dollar Wall Street regime

Rambaullet Summit 1975 wea rights hub-and-spots/ subversive bandwagoning

Wednesday, August 7, 2013

FIVE CASES OUT OF THE BLUE:

Today is August 07th, 2013, I am in New York City, at the Manhattan Courts System, fighting a case among other, for Criminal Trespass. I have to wait till 2:00PM to confront the issue.

This is what happened! One morning after Hurricane Sandy, a short time after October, I sat in the NJ Transit bus terminal. It was the first snow day of the year and in front of my eyes, it was becoming winter. I was cold so I went to the bus depot. A couple of officers asked if I had a ticket, I said no, and they took my Driver's License, and detained me.

Moments later, my world changed, and today since, I have five open cases relating to the same issue. I didn't know it was trespassing to sit at a bus depot. I presuppose that because world controversy, the killings of terrorist leaders, president in the Fertile Crescent, and other issues like protesting on Wall Street and the sever protest of the Syrians, have convoluted the minds of today's law enforcers. I believe that an incident such as mine, should be analyzed differently. The officers let everyone else walk away without a ticket, they never seen my face, so I am barely responsible for annoyance, therefore the should have ask me to leave.

Since then, I have developed five cases, one Trespassing and public lewdness. Its illegal to stand on New York City roofs. I have never heard of this. As long as I live, I can only image and be rational, that in a big urban city where there are lots of roofs, that people will utilize them. I though it was bizarre when I was told that I was charged with public lewdness, because I was doing my laundry and it was on the top floor, so the only place to go is the roof, if you don't want to be seen dressed informal. I wasn't naked! I was the only person around, so how can this be considered public lewdness?

The other cases are one for pissing in the public! Which I did, I was pissing in my pants and  has to go. A couple of patrol cars pulls up from far, while I was buckling my pants, they didn't see me do anything, because I had a big bag to cover my actions.

Another case for trespassing is in the same area. This time an individual called and said that I was looking in windows. Whatever! They asked for an order protection. This sounds weird, an order of protection by a person that you've never met. Then the allegations. Its like saying well this is what's happening and making it extra important, then making it a rule. Like sports, if we are losing to somebody that doesn't know the game or house rules we can arrange some along the way to cheat our request.